“This is a unique and exhilarating yield indeed, a decades-long epistolary exchange between two of late twentieth-century America’s wittiest and most creative minds, inventing as they go a parlance (mostly English, with much exotic admixture) at once deeply learned and wickedly ribald, parodically arch and touchingly percipient. More often than not the points of departure are the visual arts, architecture, and literature, and other subjects include extravagant ‘lagniappes of culture,’ while in counterpoint we have Philip Hoy’s energetic, resourceful exactitude. His curiosity shines its light into every nook and cranny — crook and nanny, as one under the pertinent influence might say — and indeed there are moments at which the reader suspects the editor is participating in the game he broadcasts. His scrupulous notes about their stationery dovetail with the correspondents’ ingenious allonyms, and his carefully chosen photos and other visual aids provide welcome context. Turn to this book at any point for spiritual stimulation—as inspiration for an essay on the classical, the romantic, or the baroque, as an antidote to academic ennui, as a livre de chevet—and be gratified and thankful.”— Stephen Yenser, University of California, Los Angeles, author of The Consuming Myth: The Work of James Merrill, and co-editor of the Selected Letters of James Merrill

“In the elegance, gravity, and genius of Anthony Hecht’s poetry, we sometimes catch a spirit of repartee – the same spirit that animates so much of the correspondence in this volume. In each letter Hecht exchanged with the Roman architectural historian William L. MacDonald, we follow the chase of wit from salutation to subscription. Philip Hoy’s graceful and discerning practice as editor achieves his sought-after ‘Accuracy / Relevance / Concision / Interest,’ illuminating their minds at work and play on the page.” — Saskia Hamilton, Barnard College, editor of The Letters of Robert Lowell, and co-editor (with Thomas Travisano) of Words in Air: The Complete Correspondence Between Elizabeth Bishop and Robert Lowell

“Robert Frost said he entertained ideas only to see if they entertained him. Hecht and MacDonald devote all their energies to entertaining each other. They sign off letters by the likes of Sir Cairo Portcullis, or Eddie Puss, or Timon of Akron, or Engle & Bert Humperdinck. They revel in shared feelings of contempt for a mutually disliked colleague, ‘The great arch-fool and world’s leading nitwit.’ Hecht offers to provide ‘filthy pictures’ for MacDonald’s book on Russian cities and does so under the name Jeremy Bentham. For these two close friends, every letter was a chance to perform in strikingly amusing ways. Now we can share in these entertaining performances.” — William Pritchard, Amherst College, author of Updike: America’s Man of Letters, and Frost: A Literary Life

“Reading the correspondence of poet Anthony Hecht and architectural historian William L. MacDonald is like listening in on an extended, intimate, learned, and always entertaining conversation between two extraordinary men — witty raconteurs, brilliant intellectuals and incisive wordsmiths — as they explore their interior lives, comment on friends and events, and return, again and again, to the tribulations and joys of their creative work.” — John Pinto, Princeton University, author of The Trevi Fountain, and co-author of Pietro Bracci and Eighteenth-Century Rome: Drawings for Architecture and Sculpture in the Canadian Center for Architecture and Other Collections

“These letters between two old friends, each a master of his craft, are a delight. They are full of wit and high spirits, and shot through with Rabelaisian humor. Along the way, we learn a good deal about architecture and enjoy a feast of literary gossip, as well as recondite bits of lore. Such gifts for a reader are rare.” — Eleanor Cook, University of Toronto, author of Elizabeth Bishop at Work, and A Reader’s Guide to Wallace Stevens

“It is rare to find a pair of writers with such exhilarating flair for the epistolary sport as Hecht and MacDonald. Still rarer is it for letters to find so judicious and resourceful an editor as Philip Hoy. I am reminded of a great Wimbledon final. The players have all the shots, and the umpire never misses a call.” — Jonathan Post, Distinguished Professor of English, University of California, Los Angeles, author of A Thickness of Particulars: The Poetry of Anthony Hecht, and editor of The Selected Letters of Anthony Hecht

“In their rapid shifts between intimacy, reflection, verbal wit, playful impersonations, and satirical sketches, their moving acts of memory and sharp notes on human foibles, these letters offer a fascinating map of two minds, one a great American poet and the other an important scholar of ancient architecture. Along with a sense of beauty, a strong, often dark sense of history, a vital sense of inherited culture, marks both writers, and it’s perhaps no accident that thoughts of Rome, city of ruins and reconstructions, so often link the two in their letters.” — Kenneth Gross, University of Rochester, author of The Dream of the Moving Statue, and Shakespeare’s Noise

“A Bountiful Harvest is mesmerizing. Once I opened its pages I read it voraciously. It is also a beautifully produced volume.” — Helen Searing, Alice Pratt Brown Professor Emerita of Art, Smith College

Essays in Criticism (68:4,October 2018)

These [403] letters and postcards exchanged between Anthony Hecht and William O. MacDonald over the course of roughly three decades constitute a dazzling instance of epistolary wit by two experts in the genre: Hecht, whose poetry and essays are a major achievement from the last century’s latter half; MacDonald, less well known, but highly esteemed as an architectural historian who produced many books of learned and humorous observation. It’s hard to come up with a comparable record of continuous exchange between two such energetic, gifted, and indefatigable correspondents … In searching for comparable examples of two writers engaging each other in this way, I thought of Swift and Pope, and of Ezra Pound and T. S. Eliot; but the most illustrious recent example looks to be that of Kingsley Amis and Philip Larkin, whose correspondence had a Can You Top This flavour detectable in the Hecht–McDonald enterprise … It is a tribute to Philip Hoy’s deep engagement with this enterprise that as Hecht and MacDonald conclude their vivid correspondence, no one feels the loss more than the editor of this volume. His delight in the creative imaginings and verbal sleights of hand is infectious throughout, and he gives to the whole exchange a kind of shaping spirit that makes the letters collectively add up to something even beyond their intrinsic felicities. — William H. Pritchard

The Hopkins Review (11:3, Summer 2018)

Scholarship is most often an unheralded, indeed unnoticed, business. All the more reason to declare that no editor could have performed a more thorough, judicious, and good-humored job with this … material than Philip Hoy has done. As the publisher of The Waywiser Press, he has also made sure that the book itself is an aesthetic pleasure: hardcover, nicely bound, lots of photographs,
reproductions of some of the most notable letterheads, a readable font for the 403 letters and postcards here. Hoy came to the project well situated, having published in 1999 an essential book-length interview with Hecht about his life and work. Here, Hoy’s inviting foreword is followed by further chapter introductions and supplemented by authoritative footnotes that spare the reader any temptation to go wrong with Wikipedia. At the back, chronologies for each man’s life are partnered with a glossary identifying every name mentioned. Hoy’s annotations, never excessive, do dare to be interpretive in sound ways. For instance, he supplies the surprising observation that the dialogue between the two learned friends never once referred to the Vietnam War, the Pentagon papers, the Watergate scandal, the Camp David accords, the Three Mile Island accident, or the Iran hostage crisis. And he’s right, unless you count MacDonald’s oblique allusion to that hostage crisis in a letter of 1980: ‘Dear Ol’ Fred, Bet you didn’t know that the Iranians have established a university abroad in Italy. They have a pretty good football team, and their cheer for it begins, ‘Ayatollah U. Once, Ayatollah U. Twice . . .’ Why do we read other people’s letters? We can’t quite say, but it has something to do with our quest for life lessons: we want to know how to be braver, funnier, more industrious, less foolish. Fortunately, Hecht and MacDonald did give us permission to think about our lives by means of theirs. When the poet died, the historian wrote to Helen Hecht with his deeply saddened condolences, and returned nearly all of her husband’s letters, and even their envelopes, for safekeeping. But that wasn’t wholly unexpected. As far back as August 7, 1969, Anthony Hecht had written to William MacDonald: ‘Dear Dodge Owner, I hope, for Cry Sakes, that you have kept my entire correspondence on file so that in due course you can make a mint of money by publishing my letters, you lucky bastard.’ — Mary Jo Salter

The Washington Post (May 15th, 2018)

In A Bountiful Harvest (Waywiser) editor Philip Hoy has gathered the decades-long correspondence of poet Anthony Hecht and architectural historian William L. MacDonald. Gossipy and funny, the letter-writers compete in coming up with recondite or punning names for themselves — Fritz of Cappadocia, Mel Kizzadeck, Onopodius of Nicea, Marshall Law, Calypso, Countess von Klattensmund-Hallensmund. Any admirer of Hecht — among the half dozen greatest American poets of the past half century — will want to own this delight-filled book. — Michael Dirda

Los Angeles Book Review (May 20th, 2018)

When Anthony Hecht and William MacDonald first met in Rome in 1954, both were young, unknown, and unproven. Hecht, 31, had just published his first poetry collection, A Summoning of Stones, and was on a Guggenheim Fellowship; MacDonald, 33, was on a Rome Prize Fellowship at the American Academy. Hecht went on to become one of the leading postwar American poets, and MacDonald would occupy a comparable place in the field of architectural history.  A Bountiful Harvest, edited by the British publisher Philip Hoy, documents their 36-year correspondence. That may sound dry and academic, especially as both men were, in fact, academics. But it isn’t. Seldom has a collection of letters read so consistently laugh-out-loud funny, before turning unexpectedly sad. Hecht and MacDonald were men with well-exercised comic senses, not afraid to be ridiculous, whimsical, scatological, or scathingly critical of acquaintances and public figures. Their letters are filled with puns, put-ons, mock pedantry, and even a protracted exchange of Polish jokes. Both possessed a gift for inspired Monty Python–esque silliness … Hoy’s editing is heroic. He reproduces 403 of the 440 known surviving letters and postcards, and annotates them sparingly, enough to orient readers who are likelier to know more about Hecht than MacDonald. He divides the collection into three chronologically arranged sections and provides useful biographical introductions to each, as well as a chronology and glossary of names. We follow the men through marriages, divorces, births of children, job changes, disputes with editors and department chairs, honors, and illnesses … A Bountiful Harvest reads like an epistolary novel, complete with drama and comedy, subplots and ancillary characters. — Patrick Kurp

[Letter #181]

[MacDonald to Hecht]

March 3rd, 1978

[25 Henshaw Avenue, Northampton, Massachusetts 01060]

[Letter, typed on a Harvard Club of Boston, 374 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, letterhead, with a now missing enclosure]

Dear Colonel,

Did you hear about the Englishman, the German, and the Pole who, upon arriving at the Olympic Games, found there were no seats to be had at any price? You haven’t? Well, they were in despair, milling about and smacking their foreheads (each his own forehead), when the Englishman noted a length of pipe lying on the ground at a construction site. He stripped off his outer clothing in a flash of inspiration and, grabbing the pipe, sprinted through the contestants’ gate in his shorts, shouting “England! Javelin! Smith-Waterford!” The German quickly picked up a big stone, stripped to his shorts, and ran along behind, shouting “Schott-Putt! Germany! Hoffmann!” Both men were ad­mitted without a murmur. The Pole, grasping the point with ad­mirable speed, quickly removed all his clothes except his underwear, speedily wrapped himself in the construction site’s barbed wire, and tottered through the gate, yelling “Poland! Grabowski! Fencing!”

I enclose a picture of the family out shopping; they all send greetings.

With respect, and a few giggles,

Lucian K. Truscott V, Commanding

[Letter #313]

[Hecht to MacDonald]

[February 8th, 1983]

110 East Lenox Street, Chevy Chase, MD 20815]

[Letter, typed on a The Helmsley Palace Hotel, New York, letterhead, addressed to Prof. William MacDonald, Fermentarian, 25 Henshaw Avenue, Northampton, Mass. 01060]

Here lies a famed physician, whose best skill
Could not at last evade The Bitter Pill.
No one was sure, but someone thought he sighed,
“Enema, fibula, glandular,” as he died.

Please take note that this crested letterpaper is not merely embossed, like the crummy French stuff you once employed, but is two-toned and gilded and altogether regal. I could tell quite easily how unnerved and overcome with anxiety you were about just where you stood in our sadly one-sided competition when in desperation you introduced the highly irrelevant declaration that you only used letterpaper from hotels you had actually stayed in. It shows a pathetic literalness of mind with which one can only commiserate.

Eryximachus

[Letter #348]

[MacDonald to Hecht]

August 13th, 1984

[3811 39th Street NW, #F-90, Washington, D.C. 20016]

[Letter, typed, addressed to A E Hecht, Guggenheimable, 19, East Boulevard, Rochester NY 14610]

13th day of Augustus’ very own month, ’84

My dear Senator,

That’s grand news about the Guggenheim prize, and particularly about the first-class flight. I find first class very, very enjoyable. This winter, when I go to Penn. six times or whatever, I intend to ride the Metroliner chair car, my idea of grand luxe; anyway, they said they’d pay.

I’ve been trying to plan your singing programme for La Scala and have hit some snags, but will send it along when I get it all put together. I’m pretty sure, though, that it will include “Hut Sut Rawlson on the Brawla Brawla Sewit,” and probably “Oh Promise Me.”

But seriously, that’s awfully good news. And out of the blue, instead of a sweating session of four months or a year, as so many decisions taken about us seem to use up. I’m greatly pleased for you, and envious of the trip. It does seem to me that your career is in marvelous condition, that you are at the height of your powers, where you will I hope long remain, and that you are increasingly recognized as a great artist. The reaction of the audience to your farewell address at the Library seemed, in its own way, proof of that. Savoring friends’ success is sweet.

...

Yours in nictitative anamnesis,

Lillian Gash

[Letter #381]

[Hecht to MacDonald]

January 11th, 1986

4256 Nebraska Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20016

[Letter, typed on a Croisière de Musique à bord de Mermoz letterhead, addressed to William MacDonald, conicopoly, The Getty Center for One Thing and Another, 401 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 400, Santa Monica, California 90401-1455]

Illustrious One,

It seems to me pathetically clear that even the briefest residence in California corrupts, just as Lord Acton said it would. As if your own letter, with its touching approval of L. A. architecture, were not evidence enough, there is the book, light but pointed, I am currently reading, by Paul Fussell, named Class. He quotes one Roger Price as saying “in Southern California even newscasters say ‘wunnerful’ and ‘anna-bi-od-dicks’ and ‘in-eress-ting.’” This kind of talk he characterizes as “prole,” and goes on to state: “A writer in the London Sunday Times not long ago testified to hearing that attempts were made to pervert a strike, and that somewhere a priest had been called in to circumcise a ghost. ‘Readers notify me of the lady with a painful “Ulster” in her mouth; the shrines you can see in Catholic countries in commemoration of “St. Mary Mandolin”; the police at the scene of a crime, who threw “an accordion” round the street; the touching sight of the deceased George V lying in state on a “catapult”… the student who always was to be found “embossed” in a book; the pilot who left his aircraft by means of an “ejaculation seat”; the drowning swimmer who was revived by means of “artificial insemination”; and the rainbow which was said by an onlooker to contain “all the colors of the rectum.”’ This, though it come from a British paper, sounds very Californian to me, and indicates the depths to which you have sunk. I plan to get the Banham book (I’ve already ordered it) to confirm my sad suspicions.

...

Pio No-No